Amazon Sagemaker and Google Cloud ML are two of the most popular machine learning platforms available today. Both are powerful, and both offer a lot of features and functionality. So which one is right for you? So, then let’s have a side-by-side comparison of SageMaker vs google cloud ml in today’s article.
The answer depends on your business needs and technical expertise. To decide which platform is right for you, try out both Amazon SageMaker and Google Cloud ML’s free trials and see which platform fits your needs best.
Sagemaker vs google cloud ml comparison
Choosing the right machine learning (ML) platform is critical for businesses looking to harness the power of artificial intelligence (AI). Amazon SageMaker and Google Cloud ML are two of the most popular platforms in the market, but which one is better for your business?
To find an answer to this question, we need to compare sagemaker vs google cloud ml side by side with their main services, features, and price tags.
Both Amazon SageMaker and Google Cloud ML offer a wide range of features and benefits.
At a high level, Amazon SageMaker is easier to use but offers less flexibility, while Google Cloud ML is more flexible but requires more technical expertise.
Now, let’s take a closer look at each platform.
Simplicity Vs Flexibility – Sagemaker vs google cloud ml
Amazon SageMaker was designed for simplicity, making it easy for anyone to use, regardless of their technical experience. The platform provides turnkey machine learning (ML) solutions that involve no model training, allowing you to implement existing models on the platform without any minimal coding required. Amazon SageMaker also includes automated ML services, which allow you to build and deploy custom ML models on the platform with ease.
Google Cloud ML is more flexible than Amazon SageMaker, allowing businesses to use a wider range of ML models and algorithms. The platform also offers more features for data pre-processing, including tools for data ingestion, transformation, and formatting. Google Cloud ML’s custom ML engine lets you train your own ML models using TensorFlow or Keras, which require minimal coding knowledge to use.
The setup process of Google Cloud ML is also straightforward, but it does require some coding expertise for training and deploying your data sets.
Sagemaker vs google cloud ml libraries
Amazon SageMaker has a large library of customizable machine learning (ML) services, but Google Cloud ML’s library is more comprehensive and includes a wider range of machine learning (ML) algorithms for your data processing needs.
Ease-of-use Vs flexibility
When comparing Sagemaker vs google cloud ml, SageMaker offers an easier setup process and faster prototyping than Google Cloud ML. If you prefer ease-of-use over flexibility, Amazon SageMaker is the better platform for you. However, Google Cloud ML is a better choice for businesses that need more control and flexibility over their data processing and want to use custom ML models.
Amazon SageMaker price
Amazon SageMaker comes with free trials for both its on-demand and hosted services, so you can try out the platform before committing to a subscription.
The price of Amazon SageMaker is given per second, depending on the chosen configuration.
Instance Type
The type of EC2 instance being used to run training jobs in Amazon SageMaker. Instance types are also available for use for making predictions with your model that has been deployed to an internet hosting service. Official pricing details can be found on the Amazon SageMaker pricing page.
Number of Workers
The number of workers that will be used to run your training job. This can range from one worker to thousands, depending on the size and complexity of your data set.
Data Storage
The amount of storage used for your data sets and models.
Model Storage
The amount of storage used for your models.
Hpcc / GB-s / Hplc * $0.17 per GPU hour
This is computed time on the graphics processing unit (GPU). It is required if an instance has GPUs attached to it, e.g., p2 instances.
Network Bandwidth
The amount of data that can be transferred in and out of your training job per second.
Note that all these prices are subject to change. For the most up-to-date information, please refer to the Amazon SageMaker pricing page.
When deciding whether or not to use Amazon SageMaker, it is important to consider all of the associated costs. These include the price of the Amazon SageMaker service, as well as the cost of using other AWS services, such as EC2 instances and EBS storage.
Are you an ML developer? You might want to check out this post about IBM Watson Studio.
Let us now take a deeper look at the Sagemaker vs google cloud price tags. And understand which platform suits different requirements in terms of cost-effectiveness.
Price of Google cloud ml
Google Cloud has announced the general availability of their machine learning (ML) platform, TensorFlow. It is a managed service to build and run your own models in the cloud. It provides cloud resources that automate ML lifecycle management and integrates with existing storage and compute resources in Google Cloud. You can use Cloud ML Engine to train and deploy your models on Google Cloud Platform without having to manage infrastructure or algorithms.
Pricing for the Cloud ML Engine is based on the number of hours your model runs and the amount of data processed. You are billed in six-minute increments, and there is no charge for training or inference when your models are running in the offline or online mode.
Google Cloud Machine Learning Engine comes with three levels of pricing plans:
Free tier
For applications that are less than 6 months old, have fewer than 10 GB of data, and 32 GB of RAM allocated to models training, all usage is free for up to 12 hours per day.
Standard tier
This has a pricing rate of $0.40 per hour for training and $0.10 per hour for inference.
Enterprise tier
This has a pricing rate of $0.60 per hour for training and $0.20 per hour for inference.
What platform is best for starters with limited budgets?
Both Amazon sagemaker and google cloud ml are great services for machine learning. However, if you are looking for a more affordable option, google cloud ml is the way to go. Pricing is based on the number of hours your model runs and the amount of data processed, so there is no need to worry about being charged peruse. Additionally, google cloud ml comes with a free tier for applications that are less than 6 months old, have fewer than 10 GB of data, and 32 GB of RAM allocated to models training. So if you are just getting started with machine learning, google cloud ml is the perfect option!
Who should use Amazon sagemaker?
If you are looking for a more comprehensive machine learning service, Amazon sagemaker is the way to go. With Amazon sagemaker, you can not only train and deploy your models but also manage your infrastructure and algorithms. Additionally, pricing is based on usage. Therefore like in Google cloud ML services there is no need to worry about being charged peruse. Amazon sagemaker is the perfect option for businesses that are looking to implement machine learning into their operations.
Conclusion
When comparing sagemaker vs google cloud ml we can understand that these two major cloud machine learning platforms are at the top of the game of cloud M. It’s so difficult to choose a better service. All we can do is to choose the one which best suits our business requirements. Therefore, if you are just starting, google cloud ml is the way to go. It is more affordable and provides all of the essentials you need to get started, grow and conquer. But, if you are looking for a more comprehensive machine learning service, then Amazon sagemaker is the way to go. Both platforms provide pricing plans based on usage, so there is no need to worry about being charged peruse. Amazon sagemaker is the perfect option for established businesses that are looking to implement machine learning into their ongoing operations.
Enjoying the article? Join our machine learning subreddit today.